注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

肥蝈蝈的博客

warehouse

 
 
 

日志

 
 

Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR  

2011-04-15 13:53:40|  分类: 默认分类 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
hear continuous streams

NPR News and Shows

View Schedule
hear the latest show

April 14, 2011

hear the latest news
[4 min 45 sec]

Latest NPR Newscast

Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire

Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR - 肥肥 - 肥蝈蝈的博客

A U.S. F-16 jet fighter took off from a NATO airbase in Aviano, Italy, last month. The Pentagon has estimated that U.S. involvement has cost taxpayers more than $600 million at last count.

Military intervention in Libya was supposed to be a quick mission: Use missiles and airstrikes to knock out Moammar Gadhafi's firepower and prevent attacks on civilians. Nearly a month in, Libyan rebels and government troops are stalemated and the NATO-led coalition is showing strain.

Some analysts predict the fighting in Libya could drag on for years. The U.S. and other nations are considering deepening their involvement by supplying the opposition with weapons and even ground forces. And if Gadhafi's regime falls, the coalition would presumably need to help a new government find its footing and rebuild infrastructure.

"If you want to achieve any results with failed or broken states, you have to help such countries build institutions, security, government capacity and their economy," said Anthony Cordesman, who holds the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the bipartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Doubts About U.S. Goals In Libya
Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR - 肥肥 - 肥蝈蝈的博客

Source: Pew Research Center, March 30 - April 3

Credit: Alyson Hurt/NPR

"But if you do that, you bind yourself in ways that will almost guarantee an open-ended commitment," Cordesman said. "The problem is to find the right balance, and it is all too clear we do not yet have that skill set."

The American contribution in Libya has already cost taxpayers more than $600 million at last count. So how does the U.S. avoid being drawn into a possible quagmire? NPR spoke to several experts who offered strategies to keep from getting in too deep.

Have Clear Goals, But Remain Flexible

Obama has vowed that by handing the reins to NATO, the "risk and cost of this operation — to our military and to American taxpayers" — would be kept in check. While Operation Unified Protector is in no immediate danger of going the same way as Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, public concern has begun to show.

A recent poll conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found that 57 percent of respondents said they thought military action in Libya "lacks a clear goal."

Shortly after the air campaign began March 19, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) wrote a letter to Obama stating that he and others were troubled that U.S. forces were committed "without clearly defining for the American people, the Congress and our troops what the mission in Libya is and what America's role is in achieving that mission."

James Helis, a 30-year military veteran who served in Afghanistan and now heads the Department of National Security and Strategy at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., said that to answer such criticism, it's important for U.S. policy planners "to draw lines and say these are things we are going to do and these are the things we're not going to do."

In Libya, for example, Obama ruled out ground troops but also declared that "we'll use air power, humanitarian assistance, economic and diplomatic pressure to isolate Gadhafi," Helis said.

Failure to set or adhere to clearly defined goals can lead to mission creep.

A quintessential example is the 1982-84 deployment of U.S. Marines to Beirut, Lebanon, said retired Army Col. Andrew Bacevich, a professor of history and international relations at Boston University.

Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR - 肥肥 - 肥蝈蝈的博客
AP

Rescue workers carry the body of a U.S. Marine killed in the Oct. 23, 1983, bombing of the Marine Operations Center in Beirut, Lebanon. The attack killed 241 American service members.

What began as a peacekeeping mission after Israel invaded its northern neighbor morphed into a situation where the Marines essentially were used as leverage in Lebanon's civil war, he said, making them a target. On Oct. 23, 1983, a Hezbollah suicide bomber rammed a truck packed with explosives into the Marine barracks at Beirut International Airport.

"President Reagan sent in peacekeepers for this very ill-defined mission, and 241 service members ended up getting killed," he said.

By contrast, the first Gulf War — Operation Desert Storm — was an example of military goals being too well-defined, with no flexibility. The war ended with orders from the White House not to occupy Baghdad or try to capture Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, leaving a problematic dictator in charge for 12 more years.

Desert Storm was "a situation where the U.S. had clear goals and was in the end criticized for hewing too closely to them," said Daniel Byman, director of the left-leaning Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy. He said the very nature of limits placed on so-called limited war — such as that in Libya — means "you will miss opportunities," such as taking out Hussein in 1991.

Apply Pressure On All Fronts, Not Just Militarily

The U.S. has frozen Gadhafi's assets and has tried to isolate him politically in addition to bombarding his air defenses and hitting his ground troops. It could prove a slow process, but there is past precedent for success.

The 1999 NATO operation in support of Kosovo's ethnic Albanians and against Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic applied such a multipronged approach, Byman said.

Milosevic "thought NATO would get tired and quit or that Moscow would bail him out," he said. "When Russia was finally persuaded to abandon him, it was over."

Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR - 肥肥 - 肥蝈蝈的博客
Sgt. Fernando Serna/U.S. Air Force via AP

U.S. warplanes fly over burning oil wells in Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm in 1991.

Helis of the U.S. Army War College agreed that while air and missile strikes had a major impact, it was the diplomatic pressure that gave Milosevic the final shove.

"The military part always gets the most attention, but other elements are just as important," Helis said, adding that in the case of Kosovo, "the strategy would not work unless you use them all."

Air Power Might Not Be Enough

Advanced U.S. fighter planes and precision cruise missiles have made the option of an air campaign more appealing for American presidents and policy planners. But recent history has shown that if regime change is the goal, boots on the ground are usually necessary.

Thomas Donnelly, a defense and security policy expert at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said it's a vital lesson and one the U.S. has to keep rediscovering.

"Very frequently [air power] is not going to be enough," Donnelly said. "But we still tend to think we can apply it discretely and won't suffer any losses. It also has appeal because we believe it is morally proportionate — a limited and precise use of force."

In Libya, NATO-led airstrikes have helped prevent government troops from destroying the rebel force but have failed to topple Gadhafi. The result so far is something that looks like a stalemate, Boston University's Bacevich said.

"There may not be a decisive outcome any time in the foreseeable future," he said. "In that sense, Libya could end up looking like Afghanistan or Iraq."

Don't Rush To Exit, And Understand The Limits of Power

Even before military forces are committed, there will be discussion of an exit strategy. Civilian and military strategists may want a road map that leads to an end of combat, but it's not entirely realistic to think the situation on the ground will stay predictable enough to make that possible, Donnelly said.

"If you think of each war in isolation, then you tend to go for exit strategies and end games and things like that," he said. "If you think of having a strategic interest in the balance of power in the greater Middle East, then these are campaigns in the larger picture.

"Ultimately, our test should be the ability to stay and not get shot at — not our ability to exit," Donnelly said.

Helis said it's important to remember that "just because something takes a long time does not make it a quagmire. A lot of situations don't lend themselves to quick solutions."

If the U.S. wants stability in a particular region — increasingly a goal in preventing the spread of terrorism — then some level of nation-building or institution-building is usually necessary, said Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies

Since World War II, "limited war" has been the rule rather than the exception, and as such, the U.S. must be willing to accept limited results, he said.

"Sometimes you win, and sometimes you lose," Cordesman said. "Libya is a game where the stakes are relatively low. The rebels were already there when we started to intervene. If they win, that's great; if they don't, then we can live with the outcome."

 
Podcast + RSS Feeds
 
The Two-Way

It's been another bizarre day in Tripoli for journalists trying to cover the news there.

Conflict In Libya

Ali Tarhouni boarded a fishing boat to bring money and moral support to Libya's "small Leningrad."

Conflict In Libya

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with other NATO foreign ministers in Berlin Thursday.

 
Comments

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login / Register

 

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its website or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

 

"Days not weeks" has already led to talk of a quagmire. Should go down in history with "mission accomplished".

2011年4月14日星期四 22:38:52

Wouldn't it have been easier to just give Gadhafi 600 million dollars on the condition that he opens elections and leaves Libya forever?

2011年4月14日星期四 20:15:35

Here is a nifty way to squander a few more trillion dollars. Go to war in yet another country full of people who hate us. What are we thinking? We are clearly not.

The middle east is ruled by various corrupt warlords. We should stay out and let them fight it out amongst themselves tooth and nail. For those who worry about oil, you worry about nothing. Whomever prevails must sell oil to the west to buy off their restive populaces and voracious corrupt military establishments. Enough of this sixth grade playground stuff. Because we intervene, we entangle ourselves in their folly.

The answer must be no. It is up to the people of Libya. Want to live under the heel of a crooked despot? Then do so. It is none of our damned business.

2011年4月14日星期四 18:58:54

Let's hope it ends soon!!!

2011年4月14日星期四 18:53:31

Remember when Obama said "Days Not Weeks"? When, exactly, is he going to go to Congress to get Authorization to paper over the fact that this is an illegal, unconstitutional war?

No game plan, no leadership, no strategy, no exit strategy.

He's making Former President Bush look really good about now.

2011年4月14日星期四 18:27:44

The Vietnamization of Libya has begun. "After careful consideration blah blah consulting our NATO allies blah lie squawk our brave men and women in uniform blah yap yap occupy strategic areas lie lie Libya our national interest yak yak blah make no mistake let me be clear limited surge we cannot fail innocent civilians America justice noble defend blah blah lie lie etc etc etc..."
It's all so predictable:
1. The dictator covertly supported or openly backed by the American Empire for the sake of "regional stability" (definition: enforced geopolitical order engineered to meet the interests of the Western investor class) commits the sin of disobedience.
2. The Empire issues a hypocritical self-righteous declaration claiming that America has always been on the side of "the people" and that we have always loved democracy and that we are willing to selflessly sacrifice this-that-and-the-other to restore freedom and justice from sea to shining sea etc etc.
3. Threaten and lie and bribe and bomb and murder and betray every single principle you claim to stand for in order to make sure that another brutal monster willing to sell out his nation for the US Empire assumes power.
4. Lather, rinse, repeat.

2011年4月14日星期四 18:22:41

And then there's Somalia, history's lesson that maybe a quagmire is worth being stuck in for a while. When you simply walk out, bad things tend to happen. And by 'bad,' I mean 'nigh genocidal.'

2011年4月14日星期四 17:47:09

Must be some major oil reserves hidden in Libya, why else would the wall street capos have us there.

2011年4月14日星期四 17:16:51

It is an extreme difficult situation for US to get out of this predicament. At any rate, when you started it, you better finished it. The question is: Can you finish it without losing your pride, world standing, leadership, and trust among the allies in the future? What is Obama and Hilary thinking? They may have received wrong intelligence that Gaddafi's regime could collapse once NATO carry out the air strike. Maybe we should send our ground troops in Libya to write another chapter of blood shade in the Arabic history.

2011年4月14日星期四 17:14:01

The U.N. Boss of the world.soon.

2011年4月14日星期四 16:41:52

NPR thanks our sponsors

 



引文来源  Libya: How The U.S. Can Avoid Another Quagmire : NPR
  评论这张
 
阅读(280)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017