注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

肥蝈蝈的博客

warehouse

 
 
 

日志

 
 

Should Minor Offenders Be Subject To Strip Searches? : NPR  

2011-10-12 20:59:39|  分类: 默认分类 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
hear continuous streams

NPR News and Shows

View Schedule
hear the latest show

October 11, 2011

hear the latest news
[4 min 45 sec]

Latest NPR Newscast

Should Minor Offenders Be Subject To Strip Searches?

October 12, 2011

 

The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a case testing whether prison guards may constitutionally strip-search even minor traffic offenders when they are arrested and taken to jail.

For decades, most courts did not allow such blanket strip searches, but in recent years, the pendulum has swung the other way.

Wednesday's test case began on a New Jersey highway in March 2005. Albert Florence, his wife and his little boy were in a celebratory mood as they motored their way to the home of Albert's parents. The couple had just bought a new house and had been looking at new furniture at the design center. April was at the wheel, and Albert noticed that their BMW was being followed by a state trooper. April assured her husband that she wasn't speeding, but the trooper soon signaled them to pull over. After checking April's license, the trooper asked who owned the car, and upon learning that her husband, sitting next to her, was the owner, the trooper ordered Albert out of the car, handcuffed him and arrested him on an outstanding warrant for failure to pay a fine.

More On The Supreme Court

Albert Florence, a finance director at a car dealership, had no criminal record. He had just one brush with the law, years earlier, stemming from his leaving the scene of a traffic stop. He had been fined $1,500, and when he fell behind in his payments, a judge issued a warrant for his arrest, prompting Florence to pay the amount due in full.

The problem was that the warrant had never been purged from the computer system.

Florence, however, could prove he had paid the fine. He kept the document showing he had paid in his car, and he showed the paperwork, complete with a state seal, to the state trooper. The officer apologized but said he still had to arrest him.

The Constitution requires a suspect to be promptly arraigned and, in most cases, released, on bond if necessary. However, in Florence's case, despite the best efforts of his wife, he did not get a hearing and remained in jail for a full week.

At the Burlington Country jail where he was first taken, he was told to shower and was inspected by a guard.

The guard "was at about arm's distance," Florence recalls, "and he instructed me to turn around, squat, cough, lift up my genitals, and then put on the orange jumpsuit."

Florence says he pleaded with jail authorities to check with Essex County, where the warrant originated, and he kept waiting for his hearing. But it didn't happen. Meanwhile, his anxiety was growing. By the fourth day, he says, he was "pretty messed up" and scared about not being there for his wife, who was seven months pregnant with a condition that put her at risk of a premature birth.

After five days, he was transferred to Essex County, where he expected that everything would be straightened out.

Instead, Florence found "the same hell all over again."

He was not only strip-searched, but unlike in Burlington County, where he was by himself, Florence was now mixed in with other criminals.

"I'm with a whole bunch of murderers and carjackers and rapists and all walks of life that I wouldn't wish upon anybody, " Florence says.

Finally, a week after his arrest, and after his wife got a lawyer, he was released. He sued both counties for failing to give him a hearing and for what he contends were illegal strip searches. The failure to provide a prompt hearing is still pending before the lower courts. The strip search is before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

In Washington, D.C., a woman arrested for eating a sandwich on the subway was strip-searched in front of male guards.

Florence contends that strip-searching a person who is arrested for "a noncriminal offense" violates the Constitution's ban on unreasonable searches.

His lawyer, Susan Chana Lask, notes that Florence was not arrested for a knife fight or a drug violation.

"He was pulled off the street for a traffic stop," Lask says. "There was no reason to strip-search Albert Florence unless they thought he was carrying contraband, but they never made that case."

Indeed, the state of New Jersey has a policy against strip searches without suspicion. And Lask, in her brief, calls the number of trivial offenses for which individuals are regularly arrested and would be subject to indiscriminate strip searches "astonishing." Such jailable offenses include car equipment violations, such as driving with a noisy muffler, parking violations, even riding a bike without a bell. In Washington, D.C., a woman arrested for eating a sandwich on the subway was strip-searched in front of male guards.

The New Jersey counties where Florence was imprisoned, however, have an entirely different perspective. Representing them, lawyer Carter Phillips will tell the Supreme Court that cases like Florence's are both rare and better than the alternative. Phillips notes that Essex County includes Newark, where thousands of prisoners are processed. To protect prisoners and guards alike, he argues, "it is simply the safer approach to say, if for whatever reason the system has seen fit to put you in a jail ... you have to go through the strip-search process."

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1979 ruled that prison officials may, in the name of security, conduct strip searches of prisoners who have planned contact visits with outsiders. The court said such searches are reasonable in order to prevent weapons, drugs and other contraband from being brought into the prison. Until quite recently, however, the lower courts have not permitted automatic jail-admission strip searches for those charged with minor offenses and not yet convicted. In the past decade, that trend has started to reverse. And now that question is squarely before the Supreme Court.

 
More Law
Podcast + RSS Feeds
 
Law

For decades, most courts did not allow widespread strip searches. But that's changing.

Law

Justice Clarence Thomas is the most conservative justice since the 1930s.

National Security

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab "was engaging in rituals" before the Christmas attempt, the lawyer said.

 
Comments

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login / Register

 

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its website or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

 

I hate cops. They are useless. When Republicans want to cut government spending, laying off cops is the only thing I'm in favor of.

2011年10月12日 8:44:58

Ever done the entire NJ Turnpike bumper to bumper?! I didn't need another reason to avoid NJ!!!

2011年10月12日 8:38:07

More important, should minor offenders (riding a bike without a bell, eating on the subway?!) be subject to imprisonment? What a nightmare!

2011年10月12日 8:35:26

Obviously, this isn't the America our founding fathers had envisioned - rather this is the America our founding fathers we're trying to prevent. One week in jail, plus a strip search, for nothing. Nothing. NOTHING.

2011年10月12日 8:33:05

Three comments.

First. Bad cases make bad precedents and bad law. This case is a real stinker, legal-wise.

Second, for shame on both Burlington County and Essex Countny for not having their act together. The man paid his fine, but was treated like an escapee. They should be punished for false inprisonment.

Third, traffic violators getting stripped searched once. Bad enough that Burlington County didn't have their act together. But after being incarcerated and then transferred to another county, and ten having to do the strip search all over again, that's just plain stupid and bad. Come on! Where is the common sense?

Regarding his being pulled over, smells like racial profiling to me.

2011年10月12日 8:27:34

"NoneOfYour Tyranny (SayCheese) wrote:

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time . Jails have the same procedures for all . His strip search was his tough luck,chosen by his decision to not complete his obligation to the court that he agreed to do."

--------

Did you even read the story? He had ALREADY paid the fine. The entire incident was the result of a bureaucratic error.

It's the tpye of thinking you've just exhibited that is leading the US down its current Police State path.

2011年10月12日 8:25:16

Real Conservative (Darkesthorse)
"Little gangter" You mean like skateboarders, baggy pants, kids talking loud, kids asking "why do I have to move" or kids in a group that number more than three! Those type of gangsters? All humans have rights, and it does not start at 18 yrs of age. Get your mind right and it will help you get your facts right! Like the warden told Cool Hand Luke "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

2011年10月12日 8:12:21

Don't worry been poor is not a bad thing, you just have to be willing to take it every time.

I am glad money takes care of everything before it becomes a problem as it should.

2011年10月12日 8:12:13

NoneOfYour Tyranny (SayCheese)
Maybe on your planet the system arrest criminals only! Simply being in The Mall of America, Baltimore City, or any International Airport makes you a suspect by default. They will do anything to you that they think they can get away with be you White, Black, male, female, or combat veteran! Wake Up America, a check point is coming to your town and it will have a corporate logo on it!

2011年10月12日 8:08:23

"In the Halls Of Justice, the only justice is in the halls." (Lenny Bruce)

When this comes up to the Supreme Court, there will be at least one justice who will side with whatever the overlords say. He won't offer a written opinion, because he isn't eloquent enough to argue his way out of a paper bag, but the jerking of his knee will resonate across the nation.

To those who offer the empty argument that persons suspected of violating the law have no room to complain, I can only wish them to be subjected to the same unjust treatment. Then again, that type may get a thrill out of the body cavity search.

2011年10月12日 8:08:22

NPR thanks our sponsors

 



引文来源  Should Minor Offenders Be Subject To Strip Searches? : NPR
  评论这张
 
阅读(208)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017